top of page

David Perkins' Ladder of Feedback is a structured protocol designed to help provide constructive, respectful, and effective feedback, especially in educational or collaborative settings. It consists of a series of steps that metaphorically represent climbing a ladder, starting from basic reactions and moving toward deeper critique. Here are the commonly used steps of the Ladder of Feedback, including the setup and framing:

​​

  • Purpose: Establish a safe, respectful space for giving and receiving feedback.

 

  • Steps include​

    • ​Setting clear expectations.
    • Clarifying roles (e.g., presenter vs. feedback group).

    • Emphasizing the goal: to improve the work, not to judge the person.

    • Agreeing on norms for respectful and thoughtful communication.

​​

  • Purpose: Give context and background to the work being shared.

 

  • Steps include:

    • The creator presents their work (a project, idea, draft, etc.).

    • They explain their goals, challenges, and specific areas where they'd like feedback.

    • No feedback is given yet—listeners focus on understanding.

​

  • Purpose: Ensure everyone understands the work before offering feedback.

 

  • Steps include:

    • The feedback group asks clarifying questions (not evaluative).

    • The presenter responds to help fill in gaps in understanding.

    • Avoid suggestions or opinions at this point.

​​​

  • Purpose: Begin feedback by identifying strengths.

 

  • Steps include:

    • Feedback providers share what they like, value, or admire about the work.

    • This builds trust and reinforces what’s working well.

​​

  • Purpose: Thoughtfully surface areas that might need attention or improvement.

 

  • Steps include:

    • Offer concerns in a constructive tone.

    • Focus on aspects that may be unclear, off-track, or problematic.

    • Phrase feedback as observations or questions rather than judgments.

​

  • Purpose: Provide actionable ideas for improvement.

 

  • Steps include:

    • Offer ideas, alternatives, or next steps.

    • Keep suggestions respectful and open-ended ("You might consider...", "Have you thought about...").

    • The presenter is not required to accept all suggestions.

Reflect and Respond (Optional)

 

  • Purpose: Allow the presenter to reflect and share their thoughts on the feedback.

 

  • Steps include:

    • The presenter might summarize what was helpful.

    • They can ask follow-up questions or clarify misunderstandings.

    • Helps close the loop and empowers the presenter to take ownership of their next steps.

Perkins, D.N. (2003). King Arthur's Round Table: How Collaborative Conversations Create Smart Organizations.       Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

The Handshakes

The Key to the City

© 2025 Thinking About Math- Proudly created by Brad A. Spicer

bottom of page